The 1950s is often viewed as a period of conformity, when both men and women observed strict gender roles and complied with society’s expectations. After the devastation of the Great Depression and World War II, many Americans sought to build a peaceful and prosperous society.
Place your order today and enjoy professional academic writing services—From simple class assignments to dissertations. Give us a chance to impress you.
Order a Similar Paper
Order a Different Paper
The 1950s is often viewed as a period of conformity, when both men and women observed strict gender roles and complied with society’s expectations. After the devastation of the Great Depression and World War II, many Americans sought to build a peaceful and prosperous society. However, even though certain gender roles and norms were socially enforced, the 1950s was not as conformist as is sometimes portrayed, and discontent with the status quo bubbled just beneath the surface (we will look more at this next week). Keep all of this in mind as you read the small sample of documents below.After reading Women in the 1950s, documents A-D, answer the following questions:
- Were housewives happy with their lives?
- Were women in the 1950s just staying at home?
- Documents A and B say women were staying at home; but Documents C and D say that women were politically involved and even working. Who should we believe?
- Do you think African American, Latino, Asian American, and women from other minority groups had similar experiences to those depicted in these documents?
Based on the provided information, let’s analyze the questions in relation to the sample documents:
1. Were housewives happy with their lives?
The documents do not explicitly state the happiness or satisfaction levels of housewives. Document A mentions the portrayal of housewives in media, which could imply a certain level of contentment. However, it is important to note that individual experiences may have varied, and the documents may not provide a comprehensive representation of all housewives’ feelings during that time.
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlinesOrder Paper Now
2. Were women in the 1950s just staying at home?
Documents A and B do suggest that there was a prevalent societal expectation for women to focus on domestic responsibilities and stay at home. However, Documents C and D highlight instances of women’s political involvement and work, indicating that not all women were solely confined to domestic roles.
3. Who should we believe, Documents A and B, or Documents C and D?
Rather than taking an either/or approach, it is important to recognize that different experiences and perspectives existed among women in the 1950s. Documents A and B provide insights into the dominant cultural norms and expectations placed on women, particularly emphasizing the idealized image of the housewife. On the other hand, Documents C and D shed light on instances where women were politically active and engaged in the workforce. Both sets of documents contribute to a more nuanced understanding of women’s experiences during that time.
Document A: Harper’s Weekly, 1953 (Modified)
The daily pattern of household life is governed by the husband’s commuting schedule. It is entirely a woman’s day because virtually every male commutes. Usually the men must leave between 7:00 and 8:00 A.M.; therefore they rise between 6:00 and 7:00 A.M. In most cases the wife rises with her husband, makes his breakfast while he shaves, and has a cup of coffee with him. Then she often returns to bed until the children get up. The husband is not likely to be back before 7:00 or 7:30 P.M.
This leaves the woman alone all day to cope with the needs of the children, her house-keeping, and shopping. (Servants, needless to say, are unknown). When the husband returns, he is generally tired, both from his work and his traveling. . . . Often by the time the husband returns the children are ready for bed. Then he and his wife eat their supper and wash the dishes. By 10:00 P.M. most lights are out.
For the women this is a long, monotonous (boring) daily [routine]. Generally the men, once home, do not want to leave. They want to “relax” or “improve the property” -putter around the lawn or shrubbery. However, the women want a “change.” Thus, groups of women often go to the movies together.
Source : Harry Henderson, “The Mass-Produced Suburbs: How People Live in America’s Newest Towns.” Harper’s Weekly, November 1953. Harry Henderson based his observations on extensive visits, observations, and interviews in 1950s suburbs.
Document B: The Feminine Mystique by Betty Friedan (Modified)
The problem . . . was a strange stirring, a sense of dissatisfaction, a yearning that women suffered in the middle of the twentieth century in the United States. Each suburban wife struggled with it alone. As she made the beds, shopped for groceries, matched slipcover material, ate peanut butter sandwiches with her children, . . . lay beside her husband at night–she was afraid to ask even of herself the silent question–“Is this all?” . . .
In the fifteen years after World War II, this mystique of feminine fulfillment became the cherished . . . core of contemporary American culture. Millions of women lived their lives in the image of those pretty pictures of the American suburban housewife, kissing their husbands goodbye in front of the picture window, depositing their station-wagons full of children at school, and smiling as they ran the new electric waxer over the spotless kitchen floor. They baked their own bread, sewed their own and their children’s clothes, kept their new washing machines and dryers running all day. . . . Their only dream was to be perfect wives and mothers; their highest ambition to have five children and a beautiful house, their only fight to get and keep their husbands. They had no thought for the unfeminine problems of the world outside the home; they wanted the men to make the major decisions. . .
Source : Betty Friedan was one of the early leaders of the Women’s Rights movement that developed in the 1960s and 1970s. She published The Feminine Mystique in 1963. In the book, Friedan discusses how stifled and unsatisfied many suburban women were in the 1950s.
Document C: Historian Joanne Meyerowitz (Modified)
The Woman’s Home Companion (a popular women’s magazine) conducted opinion polls in 1947 and 1949 in which readers named the women they most admired. In both years the top four women were [women involved in politics].
The postwar popular magazines were also positive about women’s participation in politics. The Ladies’ Home Journal had numerous articles that supported women as political and community leaders. One article in the Ladies’ Home Journal from 1947 encouraged women to “Make politics your business. Voting, office holding, raising your voice for new and better laws are just as important to your home and your family as the evening meal or spring house cleaning.”
[This shows that women at the time believed that individual achievement and public service were at least as important as devotion to home and family].
Source : Joanne Meyerowitz, “Beyond the Feminine Mystique: A Reassessment of Postwar Mass Culture, 1946-1958.” The Journal of American History, Vol. 79, No. 4 (Mar., 1993), pp. 1455-1482. Meyerowitz examined 489 articles in eight monthly magazines from the 1950s.
Document D: Historian Alice Kessler-Harris (Modified)
At first glance, the 1950s was a decade of the family… But already the family was flashing warning signals. . . . Homes and cars, refrigerators and washing machines, telephones and multiple televisions required higher incomes . . . The two-income family emerged. In 1950, wives earned wages in only 21.6 percent of all families. By 1960, 30.5 percent of wives worked for wages. And that figure would continue to increase. Full- and part-time working wives contributed about 26 percent of the total family income.
Source : Alice Kessler-Harris, Out to Work, 2003, pp. 301-302.
4. Do you think minority women had similar experiences to those depicted in these documents?
It is important to recognize that the experiences of minority women, such as African American, Latino, Asian American, and other minority groups, often diverged from the mainstream narratives presented in the sample documents. Minority women faced additional challenges and discrimination due to both their gender and racial/ethnic backgrounds. Their experiences were shaped by intersecting factors of race, gender, and class, which influenced their opportunities and social expectations. To gain a comprehensive understanding of their experiences, it would be necessary to consider sources and accounts specifically addressing minority women’s perspectives during the 1950s.