Please note, EVB assignment 5 corrections is due urgently by tomorrow 7/10/19 but for EVB Module 4 assignment due 7th WK, could be received on thursday 7/11/19. Please FILL OUT all the
Insructions Identify  the RESEARCH DESIGNS of each of the 4 peer reviewed articles below. Describe the LEVELS OF EVIDENCE in each of the following 4 peer reviewed articles,include explanations of the STRENGHTS of using SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS. the 4 Articles (1)Sultana,H.,Junaid,A.& Amir,M.(2016).Case-Control study of measles outbreak in tertiary care hospital.Parkistan.Journal of Medical Research 55(1),7-10 Mclaughin,J.Verlander ,N.Yates,J.Beck, C. (2019) Cross-sectional studying to describe and explore factors associated with measles immunizations and recording among cases linked to an outbreak, South West England. 2016 20(3), 150-153 Awotiwon,A., Oduwole, O., Sinha, A., & Okwundu, I. (2017). Zinc supplement for treatment of measles in children. The Cochran database of systematic reviews GCD011177. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10-/002/14651858.CD011177pub3  Jacobsen, C. Jacobsen, M., Cocyne-Beasley, T., Asafo-Adjei, K., & Szilagyi, G. (2018). Patient reminder and recall interventions rates. The Cochrane data base of system reviews, 1CD003941. https://doi-orgezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1002/14651858.CD0039.41.pub3
Please note, EVB assignment 5 corrections is due urgently by tomorrow 7/10/19 but for EVB Module 4 assignment due 7th WK, could be received on thursday 7/11/19. Please FILL OUT all the
Part A Perform a critical appraisal of each of the following 4 articles – Be sure to include: (i) An evaluation table (ii) A level of the evidence table (iii) An outcome synthesis table Part B From your created tables (i), write 1-2 pages narrative of your critical appraisal summary. (ii) One paragraph should describe and justify the best practices that were identified from the research. (iii) Include an introductory paragraph and a conclusion paragraph. Note Below are the 4 articles and the tables. (1)Sultana,H.,Junaid,A.& Amir,M.(2016).Case-Control study of measles outbreak in tertiary care hospital.Pakistan.Journal of Medical Research 55(1),7-10 Mclaughin,J.Verlander ,N.Yates,J.Beck, C. (2019) Cross-sectional studying to describe and explore factors associated with measles immunizations and recording among cases linked to an outbreak, South West England. 2016 20(3), 150-153 Awotiwon,A., Oduwole, O., Sinha, A., & Okwundu, I. (2017). Zinc supplement for treatment of measles in children. The Cochran database of systematic reviews GCD011177. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10-/002/14651858.CD011177pub3 Jacobsen, C. Jacobsen, M., Cocyne-Beasley, T., Asafo-Adjei, K., & Szilagyi, G. (2018). Patient reminder and recall interventions rates. The Cochrane data base of system reviews, 1CD003941. https://doi-orgezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1002/14651858.CD0039.41.pub3 Evaluation Table Use this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Full citation of selected article Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4 Conceptual Framework Describe the theoretical basis for the study Design/Method Describe the design and how the study was carried out Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients, attrition rate, etc. Major Variables Studied List and define dependent and independent variables Measurement Identify primary statistics used to answer clinical questions Data Analysis Statistical or qualitative findings Findings and Recommendations General findings and recommendations of the research Appraisal Describe the general worth of this research to practice. What are the strengths and limitations of study? What are the risks associated with implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research? What is the feasibility of use in your practice? General Notes/Comments Levels of Evidence Table Use this document to complete the levels of evidence table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Author and year of selected article Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4 Study Design Theoretical basis for the study Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients Evidence Level * (I, II, or III) Outcomes General Notes/Comments * Evidence Levels: Level I Experimental, randomized controlled trial (RCT), systematic review RTCs with or without meta-analysis Level II Quasi-experimental studies, systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies, or quasi-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis Level III Nonexperimental, systematic review of RCTs, quasi-experimental with/without meta-analysis, qualitative, qualitative systematic review with/without meta-synthesis Level IV Respected authorities’ opinions, nationally recognized expert committee/consensus panel reports based on scientific evidence Level V Literature reviews, quality improvement, program evaluation, financial evaluation, case reports, nationally recognized expert(s) opinion based on experiential evidence Outcomes Synthesis Table Use this document to complete the outcomes synthesis table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Author and year of selected article Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4 Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients Outcomes Key Findings Appraisal and Study Quality General Notes/Comments