There are two separate assignments. You must complete both of them.

Place your order today and enjoy professional academic writing services—From simple class assignments to dissertations. Give us a chance to impress you.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

There are two separate assignments. You must complete both of them.

There are two separate assignments. You must complete both of them.
Week 7 Please pick one and I can send you the documents associated with if needed. CASE STUDIES – CHOOSE 1 OF THESE COMPANIES You are provided research sources (with their APA 7th ed. citations) to get you started.  Chiquita Brands International Chiquita accused of funding Colombia terrorists. (2011, May 31). CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chiquita-accused-of-funding-colombia-terrorists/ Maurer, V. G. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and the “divided corporate self”: The case of Chiquita in Colombia. Journal of Business Ethics, Suppl., 88, 595-603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0313-8 Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp.  Apple juice adulteration scandal -“food fraud”   Everstine, K., Spink, J., & Kennedy, S. (2013). Economically motivated adulteration (EMA) of food: Common characteristics of EMA incidents. Journal of Food Protection, 76(4), 723-35. http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Fscholarly-journals%2Feconomically-motivated-adulteration-ema-food%2Fdocview%2F1335047045%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D8289 Buder, L. (1988, Feb 18). 2 former executives of Beech-Nut guilty in phony juice case. New York Times. http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Fnewspapers%2F2-former-executives-beech-nut-guilty-phony-juice%2Fdocview%2F426744264%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D8289  PREPARE A PPT PRESENTATION: USE YOUR PREPARATION FROM ASSIGNMENT 5. Reflecting on the concepts learned in the course, select and research the case study you selected and prepare a PowerPoint presentation according to the instructions below. You may use the 2 citations provided as part of your research. It is expected you will use the course Lessons and eReserve required readings plus your own independent research of credible sources in support of this presentation. Your research must include peer-reviewed and scholarly sources. (See Grading Rubric.) You may use internet sources for factual information about your company, but these should be the minority of your research. Use Trefry Library, Google Scholar, and similar library sources. Your Week 5 Assignment with your instructor feedback has started you on this project. Your presentation should include the following, organized in well-designed slides with accompanying Speaker’s Notes or Audio and/or video narrative. Further instructions for required content are also below: INSTRUCTIONS – CONTENT FOR YOUR PPT ASSIGNMENT (USE YOUR WEEK 5 OUTLINE FEEDBACK): 1. Begin with Title and Agenda slides. Then introduce the company (e.g. name, type of business, its corporate structure); 2. Summarize the case study. What happened? Define and explain the core ethical dilemma confronting the company, with pertinent facts;           *this includes why it is an ethical issue;          *clearly define the dilemma;  be clear as to the company’s situation and its ethical choices – the action the company chose to do and at least one other, different, choice it could have elected instead;  3. Identify, define, and explain the ethical framework you selected in Week 5 Assignment that supports, or is illustrated by, the decision the company made. In explaining the framework, include definition, theory, and an example of how it works in making a decision. How does the company’s decision and conduct illustrate this framework? 4. Identify, define, and explain the alternative ethical framework you selected in Assignment 5 that could have led to a different result for the company. Explain specifically how the company effectively could have employed this alternative framework. Include an example of how it works in making a decision. 5. Identify at least one legal issue the company faced or could have faced as a result of its decision. Examples from your studies in the course are: contract disputes; tort claims; violation of a civil or criminal statute or regulation (which you must identify specifically); civil rights; employment issue; whistleblowing. It must be a different issue from the main laws and regulations involved in the case study violations.  6. Recommend: What is a take-away from this case study for exercise of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in management of business operations? Recommend and explain at least one CSR business practice for any business. In determining your recommendation consider the concepts we have studied this term. The company you have studied for this Assignment engaged in practices that ultimately touched or affected all aspects of its management. Your recommendation must be a specific practice for any business to apply.  It is not sufficient to say something like “do it differently,” or “be ethical” or “corporately responsible.” 7. References slide: Your references must be cited fully in APA7 format, except on your PPT slide it is not necessary to use a hanging indent or double space the citations. More than 7 sources are required for exemplary level of the grading rubric.  At least 7 sources are required for the Accomplished level of the rubric. Please see the rubric’s requirement for including scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources.  What Peer-reviewed and Scholarly Mean 8.  Overall: Review the Grading Rubric for an understanding of all grading criteria. 9. Speaker’s notes are required to provide your PPT narrative, either in the notes spaces below the slides or by audio or video narrative.
There are two separate assignments. You must complete both of them.
This Assignment begins your Course Project.  To get started: You must select one of the 2 company case studies listed in Assignment 7. Please read Assignment 7 Instructions first for this Assignment!  ASSIGNMENT: Worksheet  Instructions: Go to Week 7 Assignment – Read Instructions  there. Choose the company for your case study from the selection provided in the Week 7 Assignment. Return to Assignment 5: *DOWNLOAD & SAVE: Attached to this Assignment 5 is a WORD Document that is your Worksheet for this Assignment. Download and save this document and complete the table by answering the listed questions ON THE TABLE in the second column. Do not recreate a different document or change the format of this Assignment (except to save to your computer and re-open if necessary for input on the document). This is the form that you are to use.   For selecting and applying ethical frameworks: see Week 5 Lesson and readings. When you have completed the document, save and SUBMIT it to this Assignment box as a WORD document. There are questions that require you to provide peer-reviewed or scholarly citations: What Peer-reviewed and Scholarly Mean *Grading will be by points per question as shown on far right column of the table. Each question is worth up to 10 points. This Assignment is worth a total of 100 points.  This Assignment will assist you in preparing your PowerPoint presentation for the Week 7 Assignment, Part 2 of the Course Project. BUSN311 Week 5 Assignment. Answer the following questions in the table second column according to the company case study you selected from the Week 7 Assignment choices. For citation answers, full APA citation is required. As indicated on the table, each question is worth a total of 10 points. Save and upload the completed document to your Week 5 Assignment. QUESTION ANSWER (Citations – APA format) POINTS 100 SCORE (1) Name the company case study you have chosen. 10 (2) In this case study the company made a key decision central to the scandal and causing legal implications. State in one sentence the two choices the company had and the decision in made. For example, this is a statement of a decisional dilemma: “Company ABC chose the cheaper option of dumping toxic waste in the River Green instead of disposing it in proper containers at legally authorized toxic waste disposal facility.” 10 (3) Identify the law(s) and/or regulation(s) violated by the company’s action, including statute citation. Example: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq. (1970) 10 (4) Choose ONE of the following three ethical frameworks that most closely explains the company’s choice of conduct in making this decision. Write your selection in the next column. YOU WILL DEVELOP THIS IN YOUR WEEK 7 PPT. free market ethics egoism utilitarianism 10 (5) Cite one peer-reviewed or scholarly article* that explains and discusses the ethical framework you selected in the above question. 10 (6) Choose ONE of the following three ethical frameworks that, if followed by the company, would have led the company to make a different decision. Write your selection in the next column. YOU WILL DEVELOP THIS IN YOUR WEEK 7 PPT. ethics of care virtue ethics deontology 10 (7) Cite one peer-reviewed or scholarly article that explains and discusses the ethical framework you selected in the above question. 10 (8) Identify another legal issue involving this company either in the case study or otherwise in your research about this company. This must relate to the company and be in addition to the main legal issue or claim relating to the decision. Examples: contract, bankruptcy, whistleblowing, employment law, torts, intellectual property, criminal law, intellectual property. Simply state the area of law or claim here. You will expand and explain this in your Week 7 PPT. 10 (9) In one-sentence, recommend a take-away business practice from this case study for corporations in general relating to corporate social responsibility (CSR). This should be an actual practice to engage – not just a statement like “exercise CSR.” You will expand and discuss this in your Week 7 PPT presentation. 10 (10) Cite a scholarly or peer-reviewed* article about CSR and/or recommended CSR business practices. 10 Total *For explanation of scholarly and peer-reviewed, see your Lessons under Content. Also, note the requirement here is for a scholarly or peer-reviewed artlcle.
There are two separate assignments. You must complete both of them.
BUSN311 Week 5 Assignment. Answer the following questions in the table second column according to the company case study you selected from the Week 7 Assignment choices. For citation answers, full APA citation is required. As indicated on the table, each question is worth a total of 10 points. Save and upload the completed document to your Week 5 Assignment. QUESTION ANSWER (Citations – APA format) POINTS 100 SCORE (1) Name the company case study you have chosen. 10 (2) In this case study the company made a key decision central to the scandal and causing legal implications. State in one sentence the two choices the company had and the decision in made. For example, this is a statement of a decisional dilemma: “Company ABC chose the cheaper option of dumping toxic waste in the River Green instead of disposing it in proper containers at legally authorized toxic waste disposal facility.” 10 (3) Identify the law(s) and/or regulation(s) violated by the company’s action, including statute citation. Example: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq. (1970) 10 (4) Choose ONE of the following three ethical frameworks that most closely explains the company’s choice of conduct in making this decision. Write your selection in the next column. YOU WILL DEVELOP THIS IN YOUR WEEK 7 PPT. free market ethics egoism utilitarianism 10 (5) Cite one peer-reviewed or scholarly article* that explains and discusses the ethical framework you selected in the above question. 10 (6) Choose ONE of the following three ethical frameworks that, if followed by the company, would have led the company to make a different decision. Write your selection in the next column. YOU WILL DEVELOP THIS IN YOUR WEEK 7 PPT. ethics of care virtue ethics deontology 10 (7) Cite one peer-reviewed or scholarly article that explains and discusses the ethical framework you selected in the above question. 10 (8) Identify another legal issue involving this company either in the case study or otherwise in your research about this company. This must relate to the company and be in addition to the main legal issue or claim relating to the decision. Examples: contract, bankruptcy, whistleblowing, employment law, torts, intellectual property, criminal law, intellectual property. Simply state the area of law or claim here. You will expand and explain this in your Week 7 PPT. 10 (9) In one-sentence, recommend a take-away business practice from this case study for corporations in general relating to corporate social responsibility (CSR). This should be an actual practice to engage – not just a statement like “exercise CSR.” You will expand and discuss this in your Week 7 PPT presentation. 10 (10) Cite a scholarly or peer-reviewed* article about CSR and/or recommended CSR business practices. 10 Total *For explanation of scholarly and peer-reviewed, see your Lessons under Content. Also, note the requirement here is for a scholarly or peer-reviewed artlcle. BUSN311/Wk5/Ashar/04-2023 ©APUS 2023

Writerbay.net

When writing your assignment, we aim to help you get an A, not just beat the deadline.

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper