Law Case Review 2: Hendrick Hudson SD v Rowley You can complete most of the case review from the information in the textbook, but do a search anyway. After you read about the case, consider this: Wh

Place your order today and enjoy professional academic writing services—From simple class assignments to dissertations. Give us a chance to impress you.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Law Case Review 2: Hendrick Hudson SD v Rowley

You can complete most of the case review from the information in the textbook, but do a search anyway.  After you read about the case, consider this:  What does “appropriate education” mean to you?  Does it mean the latest and greatest, the most update technology, or support services that would enrich?

EDU 660 Law Case Review Template -Rev 09-16-6.docDownload EDU 660 Law Case Review Template -Rev 09-16-6.doc

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

EDU 660 Law Case Review Instructions-4.docx

Law Case Review 2: Hendrick Hudson SD v Rowley You can complete most of the case review from the information in the textbook, but do a search anyway. After you read about the case, consider this: Wh
EDU 660 LEGAL CASE REVIEWS Name _______________________________Date _________________ Case Citation: ______________________________________________ Facts: Explain the essential facts of the case. Tell the story of the case. Decision in administrative hearings and the lower courts: State the decision made in each. Rationale: Explain the gist of the court ruling (i.e., why the court arrived at its holding). Holding: The precise ruling of the court. Scope of the holding: Answer the following. Identify the jurisdiction of the final court: List the area or states that make up the court’s jurisdiction: List the population addressed by the court: List the issue(s) or cause(s) addressed by the case: 6. Personal Reflection:
Law Case Review 2: Hendrick Hudson SD v Rowley You can complete most of the case review from the information in the textbook, but do a search anyway. After you read about the case, consider this: Wh
3 EDU 460 & 660 CASE STUDIES INSTRUCTIONS Using the attached Legal Case Review template complete the assignment for each of the following 6 legal cases listed here. Cases for this trimester are: Mills v Board of Education Schaffer v Weast Clyde K. v Puyallup School District Board of Educ of the Hendrick Hudson School District v Rowley Daniel R.R. v State Board of Education Tinker v Des Moines Independent Community School Save the template on your hard drive and rename the file for each case. Submit completed case review via dropbox as an attachment. 20 points each. Information for these cases can be found: in your textbook…look in the Case Index in the back of the textbook. ****Refer to the textbook before searching/googling. legal databases or legal journal indexes, but there is usually a fee to join just by searching/googling the case (Shaffer v Weast is mentioned on over 16,000 websites) http://www.wrightslaw.com This is the TK20 assignment. Do not submit them to TK20 individually but as one document. Read through the law case review sample provided. CONTINUED ON PAGE 2 EDU 460/660 LEGAL CASE REVIEWS Name _______________________________Date _________________ If you do not know what a case citation is, refer to Chapter 2. The case citation can be found on the Internet. It is not just the name of the case. Case Citation: ______________________________________________ Facts: Explain the essential facts of the case. Tell the story of the case. This will probably be the lengthiest response. Two or three sentences will not suffice. Explain the essential facts of the case; describe all aspects of the case; cite complainant profile, disability, issue; provide up-to-date facts. Decision in administrative hearings and the lower courts: State the decision made in each. Provide information/decision in all courts. Some of the cases went to a hearing officer or administrative due process, then a district court of appeals, and then to the U.S. Supreme Court. Rationale: Explain the gist of the court ruling (i.e., why the court arrived at its holding). This is the reason the court arrived at its decision. It may be based on interpretation of the IDEA federal law. The court may refer to case law that has already been established. The court may consider a “factor-test” such as the four-factor test established in the Rachel H case. Holding: The precise ruling of the court. The length of this response can vary. It may be something as simple as the court held that the student’s placement was the LRE and the judgment of the district court was affirmed, or the answer may require a list of 3 or 4 decisions made by the court. Explain the gist of final court ruling; define main focus; explain relevance to special education issues. Scope of the holding: Identify the jurisdiction of the court , the population addressed by the court, and the issue(s) or cause(s) addressed in the case. This may be the US District Court, and if so, it applies to the people residing in that circuit (list the states that make up the circuit). If a case makes it to the Supreme Court, then the jurisdiction is nationwide. (Yes, that includes Alaska and Hawaii.) All of the decisions in the cases reviewed apply to the population associated with the public schools. Your statement should read something like this: This case was heard by the United States Supreme Court whose jurisdiction is nationwide. It affects all those associated with public schools. The case was related to least restrictive environment. If it was heard by a circuit court, then the statement may look like this: This case was heard by the Fifth Circuit Court which is comprised of Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi and applies to all the people residing in therein and associated with public schools. The issue of this case was least restrictive environment. Personal Reflection: State personal opinion of the pros and cons of the case decision(s); describe personal like or dislike for the decision(s); personal and/or professional implications for teaching. How does the case affect you or your students? List the resources you used. They do not have to be in a formal bibliography.

Writerbay.net

When writing your assignment, we aim to help you get an A, not just beat the deadline.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper