3 pages due 9 hrs
NSG3036 W2A2 Research Template Name Cite both articles reviewed in APA style: ***In the template, any direct quotes from the articles needs to only include the page number. Week 2 Template Quantitative Article Qualitative Article Summarize the two assigned articles. In a paragraph, describe in your own words what the study was about and what the researchers found. Identify and describe the problem for each article Identified the purpose statement for each article Identified hypothesis and/or research questions depending on the methodology used in the articles. After analyzing, discuss each article’s significance to nursing practice. Identify two details to support the study being quantitative or qualitative
3 pages due 9 hrs
W4A2 Rubric Unsatisfactory 1 Emerging 2 Proficient 3 Exemplary 4 Score Assignment Components Identify and describe the sample with demographics in the studies chosen in W2 Assignment 2. Report included minimal information about the sample in the studies chosen in W2 Assignment 2. Report described a few details about the sample in the studies chosen in W2 Assignment 2. The description was short and missed several details. Report described the sample in the studies chosen in W2 Assignment 2 accurately. More details could have been provided. Report described the sample in the studies chosen in W2 Assignment 2 well. Accurate and adequate details were provided. [Score x 10 = 24 pts] Discussed the steps for the data collection process used in the studies. Minimal discussion was provided on the data collection process in the studies. The discussion included an outline of the data collection process used in the studies. The discussion included a clear and complete data collection process used in the studies. The discussion included a clear, detailed, and complete data collection process used in the studies. [Score x 4 = 16 pts] Identified the variables (independent and dependent) Variables were listed with no detail. Those variables identified were correct but incompletely identified.. The identified variables were correct but lacked detail. The variables for the studies were all identified and clearly described. Score x 4 = 16 pts] Identified the sampling design for each study. The identified sampling design is incomplete for each study The identified sampling design is somewhat clear and correct for each study. The identified sampling design is clear and correct for each study. The identified sampling design is clear and detailed and demonstrates a deep understanding of the studies. [Score x 3 = 12 pts] Described the instrument or tool or survey used in each article. Minimal or no description was included about the instrument, tool, or survey in each article. Description was included on the instrument, tool, or survey. However, the description missed several details in each article. Description was included on the instrument or tool or survey. The description included most details in each article. A clear and detailed description was included on the instrument, tool, or survey in each article. [Score x 3 = 12 pts] Summarized the discussion regarding the validity and reliability of the instrument for each article. Vaguely summarized the discussion of the reliability and validity of the instrument for each article. Summarized the discussion of the reliability and validity of the instrument with minimum details for each article. Summarized the discussion of the reliability and validity of the instrument with most details for each article. Summarized the discussion of the reliability and validity of the instrument with complete and well- supported details for each article. [Score x 5 = 20 pts] Discussed the legal and ethical concerns from each research article. Included IRB approval and informed consent. Ineffectively defined the legal and ethical concerns from each research article. Did not include IRB approval or informed consent. Defined legal and ethical concerns from each research article. Provided some aspects of IRB approval and informed consent. Defined legal and ethical concerns from each research article which included some aspects of IRB approval and informed consent. Specific examples and resources are used in support. Defined legal and ethical concerns from each research article which included all aspects of IRB approval and informed consent. Specific, unique examples and resources are used in support. [Score x 3 = 12 pts] Written Components Organization Did not follow template format Followed format of template for some criteria Followed format of template for most criteria Followed format of template [Score x 1 = 4 pts] Usage and Mechanics Grammar Spelling Sentence structure Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension. Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension. Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension. The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic. [Score x 4 =16 pts] APA Elements Attribution Paraphrasing Quotations No attempt at APA format. APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant. Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor. Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present. [Score x 2 = 8 pts] Subtotal Timeliness Late Work penalty: Total Score / 140